Rebecca Sramkova vs Laura Siegemund Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W L L
Form
L W L L L W L L L LH2H: Sramkova 2 - 0 Siegemund
They have played 4 sets in total, with Sramkova winning 4 and Siegemund winning 0. The last match between Sramkova and Siegemund was at the Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang, 02-11-2024, Semifinals, Hard with Rebecca Sramkova getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rebecca Sramkova | 2 |
| Laura Siegemund | 0 |
Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang(02-11-2024)
7
6
6
2
| Sramkova | Stats | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| 40% (8-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (6-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 38 | Ranking | 95 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 28 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 16 |
| 61% (424-270) | Career Total W/L | 59% (532-368) |
| $1,109,849 | Career Prize Money | $2,948,445 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats 
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 16 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:4:23 | Average Match Time | 2:4:23 |
| 62% (95/154) | 1st Serve % | 65% (91/141) |
| 64% (61/95) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (47/91) |
| 53% (31/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (25/50) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 26% (5/19) |
| 49% (69/141) | Return Points Win % | 40% (62/154) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rebecca Sramkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Johanne Svendsen
61%
(
73 of
119)
1st Serve %
109%
(
60 of
55)
9
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
123)
127
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Lulu Sun
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Laura Siegemund
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Laura Siegemund
50%
(
59 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Laura Siegemund
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Laura Siegemund
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ana Konjuh
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Laura Siegemund
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
85 of
116)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
51 of
85)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Laura Siegemund
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Laura Siegemund
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (424/270) | Win/Loss | 59% (532/368) |
| 59% (947/661) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1190/885) |
| 53% (8021/7008) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10036/8909) |
| 55% (78/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (140/134) |
| 64% (238/131) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (339/185) |
| 60% (97/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (40/36) |
| 55% (11/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (13/13) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1576 | Aces Total | 430 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1424 | Total Double Faults | 1632 |
| 1:9:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 426.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 476.5 |
| 58% (20196/34859) | 1st Serve % | 70% (23763/33976) |
| 64% (13004/20196) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14276/23763) |
| 47% (6833/14663) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4706/10195) |
| 45% (1962/4315) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2128/4473) |
| 45% (15506/34608) | Return Points Win % | 46% (15844/34268) |
| 51% (27/26) | Slam W/L | 52% (42/39) |
| 59% (17/12) | Masters W/L | 53% (47/41) |
| 50% (6/6) | Cups W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 48% (34/37) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (142/109) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (259/160) | Challenger W/L | 60% (239/157) |
| 74% (81/29) | Futures W/L | 75% (58/19) |
| 61% (416/684) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (524/887) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 57% (93/163) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (93/178) |
| 54% (120/222) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (151/282) |
| 86% (419/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (512/443) |
| 14% (419/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (512/69) |
| 22% (275/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (387/88) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
